Montana · NCES F-33 finance data

School Funding Equity in Montana

141 districts ranked by how equitably school funding is distributed, scored from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states.

38
State avg score
49
National avg score
141
Districts ranked

The equity picture in one line

Heart Butte K-12 Schools ranks first in Montana for funding equity at 74/100, in a state whose districts average 38 against a national average of 49.

74/100
top score (Heart Butte K-12 Schools)
$25,591
per-pupil spending in the top district
4
districts scoring 70 or higher
50
districts below 30
# District Score
1 Heart Butte K-12 Schools 74
2 Poplar Elem 72
3 Browning Elem 71
4 Arlee Elem 71
5 Hays-Lodge Pole K-12 Schls 69
6 Wolf Point Elem 68
7 St Ignatius K-12 Schools 68
8 Lodge Grass Elem 68
9 Hardin Elem 67
10 Harlem Elem 66
11 Wolf Point H S 65
12 Lame Deer Elem 64
13 Anaconda Elem 62
14 Poplar H S 62
15 Livingston Elem 61
16 Rocky Boy Elem 61
17 Victor K-12 Schools 61
18 Troy Elem 60
19 Colstrip Elem 59
20 Box Elder Elem 59
21 Evergreen Elem 58
22 Park City Elem 56
23 Baker K-12 Schools 55
24 Sidney H S 55
25 Bonner Elem 55
26 Chinook Elem 54
27 Boulder Elem 54
28 Cut Bank Elem 53
29 Harlowton K-12 52
30 Centerville Elem 52
31 Ronan Elem 51
32 Malta K-12 Schools 51
33 Superior K-12 Schools 51
34 Whitehall Elem 50
35 Thompson Falls Elem 50
36 Forsyth Elem 49
37 Stevensville H S 48
38 Darby K-12 Schools 48
39 Lone Rock Elem 48
40 Miles City Elem 46
41 Glendive Elem 46
42 Huntley Project K-12 Schools 46
43 Twin Bridges K-12 Schools 46
44 Browning H S 45
45 Ronan H S 45
46 Cut Bank H S 45
47 Plains K-12 43
48 Park H S 43
49 Plentywood K-12 Schools 43
50 Hamilton K-12 Schools 42
51 Corvallis K-12 Schools 41
52 Fort Benton Elem 41
53 Smith Valley Elem 41
54 Helena H S 40
55 Frenchtown K-12 Schools 40
56 Polson Elem 40
57 Glasgow K-12 Schools 40
58 Deer Lodge Elem 40
59 Dawson H S 40
60 Red Lodge Elem 40
61 Shepherd H S 40
62 Lewistown Elem 39
63 Helena Elem 38
64 Missoula H S 38
65 Big Sky School K-12 38
66 Great Falls Elem 37
67 Missoula Elem 37
68 Polson H S 37
69 Roundup Elem 37
70 Manhattan High School 37
71 Clinton Elem 37
72 Butte H S 36
73 Lolo Elem 36
74 Manhattan School 36
75 Choteau Elem 36
76 Lockwood K-12 35
77 Libby K-12 Schools 35
78 Eureka Elem 35
79 Florence-Carlton K-12 Schls 34
80 Shepherd Elem 34
81 Billings Elem 33
82 Sidney Elem 33
83 Fergus H S 33
84 Columbia Falls H S 32
85 Anaconda H S 32
86 Joliet Elem 32
87 Laurel Elem 31
88 Ennis K-12 Schools 31
89 Conrad Elem 31
90 Fairfield Elem 31
91 Hardin H S 30
92 Columbia Falls Elem 29
93 Havre Elem 29
94 Townsend K-12 Schools 29
95 Whitefish H S 29
96 Somers Elem 29
97 Jefferson H S 29
98 Canyon Creek Elem 29
99 Cascade Elem 29
100 Thompson Falls H S 29
101 Scobey K-12 Schools 28
102 Kalispell Elem 27
103 Belgrade Elem 27
104 Montana City Elem 27
105 Dillon Elem 26
106 Three Forks Elem 26
107 Bigfork H S 26
108 Beaverhead County H S 26
109 Lincoln County H S 26
110 Independent Elem 26
111 West Yellowstone K-12 26
112 Helena Flats Elem 26
113 Target Range Elem 25
114 Cayuse Prairie Elem 25
115 Belt Elem 25
116 Butte Elem 24
117 Custer County H S 24
118 Billings H S 23
119 West Valley Elem 22
120 East Helena K-12 21
121 Hellgate Elem 21
122 Whitefish Elem 21
123 Havre H S 21
124 Columbus H S 21
125 Laurel H S 20
126 Anderson Elem 20
127 Bozeman Elem 19
128 Columbus Elem 18
129 Belgrade H S 17
130 Stevensville Elem 16
131 Big Timber Elem 16
132 Flathead H S 15
133 Great Falls H S 15
134 Bozeman H S 14
135 Elder Grove Elem 12
136 Shelby Elem 12
137 Elysian Elem 11
138 Monforton Elem 10
139 Clancy Elem 10
140 Bigfork Elem 6
141 Three Forks H S 5

How the Equity Score Works

The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness. According to the National Center for Education Statistics F-33 Finance Survey (FY 2021-22, released in 2024), which covers more than 17,000 districts nationwide, local property wealth drives most of the spending differences the score captures; our methodology documents each weight:

Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level, rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention