South Carolina · NCES F-33 finance data

School Funding Equity in South Carolina

74 districts ranked by how equitably school funding is distributed, scored from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states.

50
State avg score
49
National avg score
74
Districts ranked

The equity picture in one line

Allendale 01 ranks first in South Carolina for funding equity at 93/100, in a state whose districts average 50 against a national average of 49.

93/100
top score (Allendale 01)
$21,639
per-pupil spending in the top district
13
districts scoring 70 or higher
15
districts below 30
#DistrictScore
1Allendale 0193
2Lee 0187
3Mccormick 0181
4Hampton79
5Florence 0378
6Dorchester 0477
7Williamsburg 0176
8Fairfield 0174
9Dept of Juvenile Justice74
10Darlington 0173
11Sc Public Charter School District72
12Laurens 5672
13Greenwood 5170
14Lexington 0369
15Florence 0569
16Spartanburg 0768
17Laurens 5568
18Calhoun 0168
19Chester 0167
20Marlboro 0167
21Charter Institute at Erskine66
22Orangeburg66
23Edgefield 0166
24Abbeville 6066
25Richland 0165
26Barnwell 4864
27Marion 1063
28Barnwell 4562
29Florence 0262
30Beaufort 0159
31Greenwood 5056
32Newberry 0156
33Lexington 0552
34Lexington 0452
35Charleston 0151
36Colleton 0151
37Florence 0149
38Georgetown 0149
39Chesterfield 0149
40Lexington 0248
41York 0147
42Saluda 0147
43Oconee 0146
44Union 0146
45Spartanburg 0345
46Bamberg 0345
47Sumter 0142
48Spartanburg 0642
49Cherokee 0141
50Greenwood 5241
51Anderson 0540
52York 0338
53Lexington 0137
54Anderson 0337
55Dillon 0436
56Anderson 0236
57Spartanburg 0135
58Anderson 0434
59Richland 0231
60York 0229
61Spartanburg 0428
62Dillon 0327
63Lancaster 0124
64Horry 0122
65Dorchester 0222
66York 0422
67Pickens 0122
68Kershaw 0122
69Aiken 0121
70Greenville 0120
71Spartanburg 0220
72Spartanburg 0518
73Anderson 0117
74Berkeley 0116

How the Equity Score Works

The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness. According to the National Center for Education Statistics F-33 Finance Survey (FY 2022-23), which covers more than 17,000 districts nationwide, local property wealth drives most of the spending differences the score captures; our methodology documents each weight:

Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level, rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention