An equity score of 55/100 ranks Edinburg Cisd #424 of 1047 districts in Texas (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $13,129 per pupil, Edinburg Cisd ranks #663 of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending (Texas districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
33,911
Total Enrollment
44
Schools
$13,129
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, Middle
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Edinburg Cisd operates 44 public schools serving 33,911 students, placing it in the mid-size range in Texas. The school portfolio breaks down into 35 combined, 6 middle, 3 high schools, giving families a clear picture of grade-band coverage before they move, rent, or enrol. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Hidalgo County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $13,129 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the lower half of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending. See how Texas compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 20.7% local, 52.8% state, and 26.5% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 55/100, ranked #424 of 1047 in Texas against a state average of 50, in line with the typical spread seen across the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 4 of 44 schools offering Advanced Placement (135 AP courses district-wide), a 475.5:1 student-counselor ratio, above both the ASCA benchmark and the roughly 408:1 national average, and 34.4% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 97.7% Hispanic or Latino, 1.0% White, 0.6% Asian across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Canterbury El, with a diversity index of 24.7/100.
Its largest campus is Economedes H S, enrolling 2,689 students (8% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Juvenile Detention Ctr, at 38 students, a 71x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Edinburg Cisd school enrollment varies 71× across entities
Edinburg Cisd school enrollment ranges from 38 students (lowest) to 2,689 students (highest), a spread of 2,651 students. That ratio is an extreme outlier spread — among the widest gaps observed anywhere in this dataset. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
The reported share is at least 75%, indicating a high concentration of measured economic need. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Edinburg Cisd student-counselor ratio is 476:1 — high (typically associated with staffing constraints that limit per-student counselor time; CRDC data shows higher ratios cluster in larger urban systems)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.
Edinburg Cisd chronic absenteeism rate is 34.4% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.