Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Yamhill, Oregon - 3 schools
An equity score of 20/100 ranks Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 #154 of 160 districts in Oregon (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $12,717 per pupil, Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 ranks #180 of 194 Oregon districts by per-pupil spending (Oregon districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
1,108
Total Enrollment
3
Schools
$12,717
Per-Pupil Spending
Elementary, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 operates 3 public schools serving 1,108 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Oregon. The school portfolio breaks down into 2 elementary, 1 high schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Yamhill County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $12,717 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, among the bottom 20 of 194 Oregon districts by per-pupil spending. See how Oregon compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 37.0% local, 56.4% state, and 6.7% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 20/100, ranked #154 of 160 in Oregon against a state average of 50, notably less even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 1 of 3 schools offering Advanced Placement (1 AP courses district-wide), a 308:1 student-counselor ratio, somewhat above the 250:1 ASCA recommendation, and 31.7% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 81.0% White, 11.8% Hispanic or Latino, 0.8% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Yamhill Carlton Intermediate School, with a diversity index of 34.0/100.
Yamhill Carlton Intermediate School accounts for 33.3% of all Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 student enrollment
That dominant concentration means Yamhill Carlton Sd 1-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: elementary. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.
Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 student-counselor ratio is 308:1 — near the typical range (US average ~408) — within the typical range for U.S. public districts
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Variation between sub-units within Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 is typically wider than the Yamhill Carlton Sd 1-aggregate figure suggests.
Yamhill Carlton Sd 1 chronic absenteeism rate is 31.7% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.