School Funding Equity in Florida
67 districts ranked by equity score — how equitably is school funding distributed? Equity is computed from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states. See our methodology.
51
State Avg Score
49
National Avg Score
7
Highly Equitable (70+)
5
Low Equity (<30)
| # | District | Score |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | GADSDEN | 89 |
| 2 | BAKER | 82 |
| 3 | WASHINGTON | 75 |
| 4 | MONROE | 73 |
| 5 | LAFAYETTE | 72 |
| 6 | JACKSON | 71 |
| 7 | LIBERTY | 71 |
| 8 | BRADFORD | 69 |
| 9 | GILCHRIST | 68 |
| 10 | GULF | 68 |
| 11 | SARASOTA | 67 |
| 12 | LEVY | 66 |
| 13 | DIXIE | 65 |
| 14 | HAMILTON | 65 |
| 15 | FRANKLIN | 64 |
| 16 | PINELLAS | 63 |
| 17 | GLADES | 63 |
| 18 | MADISON | 62 |
| 19 | MARTIN | 61 |
| 20 | HIGHLANDS | 60 |
| 21 | TAYLOR | 60 |
| 22 | PALM BEACH | 59 |
| 23 | MANATEE | 59 |
| 24 | ESCAMBIA | 58 |
| 25 | CALHOUN | 58 |
| 26 | DESOTO | 57 |
| 27 | INDIAN RIVER | 54 |
| 28 | HARDEE | 52 |
| 29 | ORANGE | 51 |
| 30 | COLLIER | 51 |
| 31 | CHARLOTTE | 51 |
| 32 | BROWARD | 50 |
| 33 | CITRUS | 50 |
| 34 | COLUMBIA | 50 |
| 35 | POLK | 49 |
| 36 | BAY | 49 |
| 37 | SUWANNEE | 49 |
| 38 | JEFFERSON | 49 |
| 39 | UNION | 48 |
| 40 | VOLUSIA | 47 |
| 41 | WALTON | 47 |
| 42 | MIAMI-DADE | 46 |
| 43 | CLAY | 46 |
| 44 | HILLSBOROUGH | 43 |
| 45 | PASCO | 43 |
| 46 | MARION | 43 |
| 47 | LEON | 43 |
| 48 | WAKULLA | 43 |
| 49 | ALACHUA | 41 |
| 50 | BREVARD | 40 |
| 51 | SUMTER | 40 |
| 52 | NASSAU | 38 |
| 53 | PUTNAM | 37 |
| 54 | HERNANDO | 36 |
| 55 | DUVAL | 35 |
| 56 | ST. LUCIE | 35 |
| 57 | HOLMES | 35 |
| 58 | ST. JOHNS | 34 |
| 59 | SANTA ROSA | 34 |
| 60 | LEE | 32 |
| 61 | OKEECHOBEE | 32 |
| 62 | OKALOOSA | 31 |
| 63 | LAKE | 29 |
| 64 | HENDRY | 29 |
| 65 | FLAGLER | 25 |
| 66 | SEMINOLE | 23 |
| 67 | OSCEOLA | 21 |
How the Equity Score Works
The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness:
Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level — rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention
Read our methodology — how this data is sourced, computed, and verified.