Florida · NCES F-33 finance data

School Funding Equity in Florida

67 districts ranked by how equitably school funding is distributed, scored from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states.

51
State avg score
49
National avg score
67
Districts ranked

The equity picture in one line

Gadsden ranks first in Florida for funding equity at 91/100, in a state whose districts average 51 against a national average of 49.

91/100
top score (Gadsden)
$13,871
per-pupil spending in the top district
8
districts scoring 70 or higher
7
districts below 30
#DistrictScore
1Gadsden91
2Glades82
3Lafayette82
4Jefferson80
5Jackson79
6Taylor79
7Franklin76
8Liberty75
9Hardee69
10Union69
11Hamilton69
12Gulf68
13Monroe67
14Sarasota66
15Collier63
16Highlands63
17Calhoun63
18Dixie63
19Putnam62
20Desoto62
21Palm Beach60
22Escambia60
23Holmes60
24Madison60
25Pinellas59
26Washington57
27Gilchrist57
28Charlotte54
29Citrus53
30Baker53
31Walton52
32Sumter52
33Indian River51
34Miami-Dade50
35Levy50
36Wakulla49
37Polk47
38Clay47
39Broward46
40St. Lucie46
41Martin45
42Duval44
43Columbia44
44Suwannee44
45Brevard43
46Okeechobee43
47Orange42
48Hernando41
49Volusia40
50Manatee38
51Okaloosa38
52Marion36
53Leon36
54Santa Rosa35
55Hillsborough34
56Lee33
57Hendry31
58Bradford31
59Pasco30
60Lake30
61Bay28
62Seminole25
63Alachua25
64Osceola24
65St. Johns23
66Nassau19
67Flagler17

How the Equity Score Works

The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness. According to the National Center for Education Statistics F-33 Finance Survey (FY 2022-23), which covers more than 17,000 districts nationwide, local property wealth drives most of the spending differences the score captures; our methodology documents each weight:

Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level, rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention