Maryland · NCES F-33 finance data

School Funding Equity in Maryland

24 districts ranked by how equitably school funding is distributed, scored from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states.

53
State avg score
49
National avg score
24
Districts ranked

The equity picture in one line

Somerset County Public Schools ranks first in Maryland for funding equity at 97/100, in a state whose districts average 53 against a national average of 49.

97/100
top score (Somerset County Public Schools)
$24,750
per-pupil spending in the top district
5
districts scoring 70 or higher
4
districts below 30
#DistrictScore
1Somerset County Public Schools97
2Kent County Public Schools90
3Dorchester County Public Schools79
4Wicomico County Public Schools76
5Allegany County Public Schools71
6Worcester County Public Schools69
7Baltimore City Public Schools67
8Prince George's County Public Schools66
9Caroline County Public Schools66
10Garrett County Public Schools65
11Montgomery County Public Schools52
12Howard County Public Schools49
13Baltimore County Public Schools48
14Washington County Public Schools47
15Queen Anne's County Public Schools45
16Anne Arundel County Public Schools43
17Cecil County Public Schools42
18Harford County Public Schools35
19Talbot County Public Schools33
20Charles County Public Schools32
21Carroll County Public Schools26
22St. Mary's County Public Schools25
23Calvert County Public Schools21
24Frederick County Public Schools16

How the Equity Score Works

The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness. According to the National Center for Education Statistics F-33 Finance Survey (FY 2022-23), which covers more than 17,000 districts nationwide, local property wealth drives most of the spending differences the score captures; our methodology documents each weight:

Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level, rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention