Maryland · NCES F-33 finance data

School Funding Equity in Maryland

24 districts ranked by how equitably school funding is distributed, scored from NCES F-33 school finance data covering districts in all 50 states.

52
State avg score
49
National avg score
24
Districts ranked

The equity picture in one line

Kent County Public Schools ranks first in Maryland for funding equity at 96/100, in a state whose districts average 52 against a national average of 49.

96/100
top score (Kent County Public Schools)
$52,174
per-pupil spending in the top district
7
districts scoring 70 or higher
4
districts below 30
# District Score
1 Kent County Public Schools 96
2 Somerset County Public Schools 93
3 Dorchester County Public Schools 78
4 Queen Anne's County Public Schools 76
5 Garrett County Public Schools 76
6 Caroline County Public Schools 74
7 Wicomico County Public Schools 72
8 Allegany County Public Schools 66
9 Worcester County Public Schools 65
10 Prince George's County Public Schools 61
11 Baltimore City Public Schools 54
12 Calvert County Public Schools 51
13 Cecil County Public Schools 48
14 Montgomery County Public Schools 46
15 Howard County Public Schools 44
16 Anne Arundel County Public Schools 38
17 Washington County Public Schools 36
18 Baltimore County Public Schools 34
19 Charles County Public Schools 31
20 Talbot County Public Schools 30
21 Harford County Public Schools 26
22 Carroll County Public Schools 26
23 St. Mary's County Public Schools 24
24 Frederick County Public Schools 12

How the Equity Score Works

The equity score (0-100) evaluates four dimensions of school funding fairness. According to the National Center for Education Statistics F-33 Finance Survey (FY 2021-22, released in 2024), which covers more than 17,000 districts nationwide, local property wealth drives most of the spending differences the score captures; our methodology documents each weight:

Per-Pupil Spending (0-25)
Higher spending relative to peers
Need-Adjusted Spending (0-25)
Spending weighted by poverty level, rewards districts that spend more where need is greatest
Funding Diversity (0-25)
Less reliance on local property taxes, more state/federal support
Resource Access (0-25)
Lower student-teacher ratios = more individualized attention