Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Salt Lake City, Utah - 5 schools
An equity score of 66/100 ranks Ascent Academies of Utah #23 of 147 districts in Utah (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $9,868 per pupil, Ascent Academies of Utah ranks #56 of 155 Utah districts by per-pupil spending (Utah districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
2,635
Total Enrollment
5
Schools
$9,868
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, Elementary
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Ascent Academies of Utah operates 5 public schools serving 2,635 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Utah. The school portfolio breaks down into 3 combined, 2 elementary schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Salt Lake County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $9,868 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 155 Utah districts by per-pupil spending. See how Utah compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 0.8% local, 88.0% state, and 11.2% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 66/100, ranked #23 of 147 in Utah against a state average of 50, notably more even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
a 554.3:1 student-counselor ratio, above both the ASCA benchmark and the roughly 408:1 national average, and 44.4% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 57.6% White, 29.7% Hispanic or Latino, 2.7% Asian across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Ascent Academies of Utah - West Valley, with a diversity index of 59.8/100.
Ascent Academies of Utah West Jordan accounts for 26.7% of all Ascent Academies of Utah student enrollment
That concentration means Ascent Academies of Utah-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: combined. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.
Ascent Academies of Utah student-counselor ratio is 554:1 — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.
Ascent Academies of Utah chronic absenteeism rate is 44.4% — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.