2024-25 NCES data Other / mixed grade configuration NCES 268099008435
Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program — Ann Arbor, MI
Federal NCES profile for Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program, including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators — Resource Investment Index 63/100.
How this works: Each indicator above is scored 0–100 from federal NCES and CRDC data, then averaged into the Resource Investment Index. This measures resource allocation — staffing, programs, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes. Full methodology →
The verdict
Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program earns a C+ Resource Investment Index (63/100), with class sizes smaller than 99% of Michigan schools.
Public location data per NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) Common Core of Data. Verify the school's current address on the
NCES CCD record.
Enrollment
4
Michigan · 2024-25 NCES data
Teachers (FTE)
5.0
Federal CCD staff survey
Students per teacher
1.2:1
vs 18.2:1 Michigan avg
▲-93% vs state
Student-teacher ratio in context
How Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program compares with Michigan and U.S. medians
Smaller classes than state median
18.2:1 Michigan median15.9:1 U.S. median
The federal record — no proprietary index, no editorial formula.
PlainSchools publishes the actual federal measurements — enrollment, staffing, demographics, discipline, and finance — straight from the NCES Common Core of Data, CRDC, and F-33 surveys. No composite rating, no opinion-based score on top. You get the same raw numbers researchers and policymakers use, with benchmarks, spending context, and equity indicators computed from the same federal datasets. Full methodology linked below.
What this school's NCES data tells you
Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program reports 4 enrolled students to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) alongside 5.0 full-time-equivalent teachers, producing a 1.2:1 student-teacher ratio. That figure sits 93% below the Michigan state mean of 18.2:1, signalling more teacher attention per pupil than the state benchmark. Against the national 2024-25 average of 15.9:1, it is 92% lower, a useful calibration for families comparing districts across state lines.
Taken together, these measurements produce a Resource Investment Index of 63/100 (C+), calculated from 2 distinct NCES and CRDC indicators measuring resource allocation rather than academic outcomes.
How Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program compares
Cross-validating school-level NCES values against Michigan state and U.S. national means lets readers see whether this school is an outlier or in line with peers.
Metric
This school
vs Michigan
Michigan avg
U.S. avg
Students per teacher
1.2:1
▼ 93%
18.2:1
15.9:1
Enrollment
4
top 1%
—
—
Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25
Class size vs. every US school
Students per teacher (lower means more individual attention)
1Among the smallest classessmaller classes than 99% of 92,598 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
School size vs. every US school
Total enrollment — where this school sits by size (neither large nor small is 'better')
4larger than 1% of 95,891 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
What the federal data reveals about equity at this school
Federal measurements — not ratings — surface the resource and opportunity picture. Below are the indicators that researchers, civil-rights monitors, and funding formulas use to assess equity.
Staffing depth
1.2:1
students per teacher
— 93% below state mean
Top 0% in Michigan — lower ratio than 100% of state schools
Below the 15:1 benchmark — typical of schools with smaller class sizes and more individualized attention.
Support staff
Counselors0.0 FTE
Student-support staffing from the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Discipline context
0
in-school suspensions + 0 out-of-school
Suspension rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Combined in-school and out-of-school rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Reported via the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Overview
Enrollment4 Top 1% in Michigan — larger than 99% of 3,399 state schools
Teachers (FTE)5.0
Students per teacher 1.2:1 -93% vs state
Free-lunch eligible —
NCES ID268099008435
Student demographics
White
50.0% · ≈2 students
African American
50.0% · ≈2 students
White50.0%
African American50.0%
Largest group: African American at 50.0% of enrollment.
Frequently asked questions about Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program
How many students attend Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program?
Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program has 4 students enrolled. It is a other school in Ann Arbor, MI.
What is the student-teacher ratio at Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program?
The student-teacher ratio at Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program is 1.2:1, which is 93% lower than the Michigan average of 18.2:1 and 92% lower than the national average of 15.9:1. Lower ratios generally mean more individual attention per student.
What is the racial and ethnic makeup of Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program?
The largest demographic group at Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program is African American at 50.0%. The school serves a student body in Ann Arbor, MI.
What is the Resource Investment Index for Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program?
Washtenaw Deaf and Hard of Hearing Program has a Resource Investment Index of 63/100 (C+) based on 2 factors: student-teacher ratio. This index measures federal resource allocation — staffing levels, program availability, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes. Limited indicators were available, so the index reflects partial data.