Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Lynn, Massachusetts - 27 schools
An equity score of 37/100 ranks Lynn #183 of 362 districts in Massachusetts (state average 38). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $19,669 per pupil, Lynn ranks #266 of 396 Massachusetts districts by per-pupil spending (Massachusetts districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
15,556
Total Enrollment
27
Schools
$19,669
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, Elementary
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Lynn operates 27 public schools serving 15,556 students, placing it in the mid-size range in Massachusetts. The school portfolio breaks down into 11 combined, 10 elementary, 3 high, 3 middle schools, giving families a clear picture of grade-band coverage before they move, rent, or enrol. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Essex County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $19,669 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the lower half of 396 Massachusetts districts by per-pupil spending. See how Massachusetts compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 3.5% local, 70.4% state, and 26.1% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 37/100, ranked #183 of 362 in Massachusetts against a state average of 38, in line with the typical spread seen across the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 3 of 27 schools offering Advanced Placement (27 AP courses district-wide), a 716.9:1 student-counselor ratio, above both the ASCA benchmark and the roughly 408:1 national average, and 35.3% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 70.0% Hispanic or Latino, 12.1% White, 8.4% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Capt William G Shoemaker, with a diversity index of 66.7/100.
Its largest campus is Lynn English High, enrolling 2,062 students (13% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is William R Fallon, at 30 students, a 69x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Lynn school enrollment varies 69× across entities
Lynn school enrollment ranges from 30 students (lowest) to 2,062 students (highest), a spread of 2,032 students. That ratio is an extreme outlier spread — among the widest gaps observed anywhere in this dataset. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
Lynn student-counselor ratio is 717:1 — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.
Lynn chronic absenteeism rate is 35.3% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.