An equity score of 35/100 ranks Lockwood R-I #324 of 433 districts in Missouri (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $12,253 per pupil, Lockwood R-I ranks #327 of 552 Missouri districts by per-pupil spending (Missouri districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
297
Total Enrollment
3
Schools
$12,253
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Lockwood R-I operates 3 public schools serving 297 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Missouri. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined, 1 high, 1 middle schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Dade County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $12,253 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the lower half of 552 Missouri districts by per-pupil spending. See how Missouri compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 49.4% local, 26.2% state, and 24.4% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one. The district's equity score is 35/100, ranked #324 of 433 in Missouri against a state average of 50, notably less even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
a 302.8:1 student-counselor ratio, somewhat above the 250:1 ASCA recommendation, and 14.6% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 93.5% White, 0.9% Asian, 0.6% Hispanic or Latino across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Lockwood High, with a diversity index of 14.8/100.
Its largest campus is Lockwood Elem., enrolling 142 students (47% of the district's total enrollment).
Lockwood Elem. accounts for 46.7% of all Lockwood R-I student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Lockwood R-I a distant remainder — means Lockwood R-I-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Enrollment-weighted aggregates give this entity more weight than any smaller peer, while an unweighted entity average treats every record equally.
Lockwood R-I school enrollment varies 2.4× across entities
Lockwood R-I school enrollment ranges from 60 students (lowest) to 142 students (highest), a spread of 82 students. That relatively narrow ratio reflects an unusually homogeneous campus portfolio, most districts have a wider mix of school sizes. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
Lockwood R-I student-counselor ratio is 303:1 — near the typical range (US average ~408) — within the typical range for U.S. public districts
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Variation between sub-units within Lockwood R-I is typically wider than the Lockwood R-I-aggregate figure suggests.
Lockwood R-I chronic absenteeism rate is 14.6% — low (typically associated with lower-than-average attendance disruption; districts in this range often have attendance interventions, robust transportation, or smaller catchments that reduce barriers)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Lower values often correlate with smaller scale and population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se.