An equity score of 45/100 ranks Lebanon R-Iii #253 of 433 districts in Missouri (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $11,731 per pupil, Lebanon R-Iii ranks #377 of 552 Missouri districts by per-pupil spending (Missouri districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
4,480
Total Enrollment
5
Schools
$11,731
Per-Pupil Spending
Elementary, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Lebanon R-Iii operates 5 public schools serving 4,480 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Missouri. The school portfolio breaks down into 2 elementary, 1 high, 1 middle, 1 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Laclede County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $11,731 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the lower half of 552 Missouri districts by per-pupil spending. See how Missouri compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 44.9% local, 36.0% state, and 19.1% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one. The district's equity score is 45/100, ranked #253 of 433 in Missouri against a state average of 50, in line with the typical spread seen across the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 1 of 5 schools offering Advanced Placement (9 AP courses district-wide), a 357:1 student-counselor ratio, well above the ASCA benchmark though still under the roughly 408:1 national average, and 6.7% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 87.7% White, 5.3% Hispanic or Latino, 0.9% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Lebanon Middle School, with a diversity index of 24.5/100.
Its largest campus is Lebanon Sr. High, enrolling 1,439 students (35% of the district's total enrollment).
Lebanon Sr. High accounts for 32.1% of all Lebanon R-Iii student enrollment
That dominant concentration means Lebanon R-Iii-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: high. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Enrollment-weighted aggregates give this entity more weight than any smaller peer, while an unweighted entity average treats every record equally.
Lebanon R-Iii school enrollment varies 2.5× across entities
Lebanon R-Iii school enrollment ranges from 581 students (lowest) to 1,439 students (highest), a spread of 858 students. That relatively narrow ratio reflects an unusually homogeneous campus portfolio, most districts have a wider mix of school sizes. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
Lebanon R-Iii student-counselor ratio is 357:1 — high (typically associated with staffing constraints that limit per-student counselor time; CRDC data shows higher ratios cluster in larger urban systems)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.
Lebanon R-Iii chronic absenteeism rate is 6.7% — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.