An equity score of 60/100 ranks Harlingen Cisd #342 of 1047 districts in Texas (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $13,586 per pupil, Harlingen Cisd ranks #586 of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending (Texas districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
17,034
Total Enrollment
31
Schools
$13,586
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Harlingen Cisd operates 31 public schools serving 17,034 students, placing it in the mid-size range in Texas. The school portfolio breaks down into 20 combined, 6 high, 5 middle schools, giving families a clear picture of grade-band coverage before they move, rent, or enrol. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Cameron County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $13,586 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending. See how Texas compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 21.8% local, 52.6% state, and 25.6% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 60/100, ranked #342 of 1047 in Texas against a state average of 50, notably more even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 4 of 31 schools offering Advanced Placement (50 AP courses district-wide), a 341.7:1 student-counselor ratio, well above the ASCA benchmark though still under the roughly 408:1 national average, and 30.3% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 93.6% Hispanic or Latino, 4.2% White, 1.5% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Edna Tamayo House, with a diversity index of 59.4/100.
Its largest campus is Harlingen H S, enrolling 2,433 students (14% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Cameron Co J J a E P, at 1 students, a 2433x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Harlingen Cisd school enrollment varies 2433× across entities
Harlingen Cisd school enrollment ranges from 1 students (lowest) to 2,433 students (highest), a spread of 2,432 students. That ratio is an extreme outlier spread — among the widest gaps observed anywhere in this dataset. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
The reported share is at least 75%, indicating a high concentration of measured economic need. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Harlingen Cisd student-counselor ratio is 342:1 — near the typical range (US average ~408) — within the typical range for U.S. public districts
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Variation between sub-units within Harlingen Cisd is typically wider than the Harlingen Cisd-aggregate figure suggests.
Harlingen Cisd chronic absenteeism rate is 30.3% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.