An equity score of 50/100 ranks Antelope Elementary #773 of 1526 districts in California (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $14,649 per pupil, Antelope Elementary ranks #1442 of 1880 California districts by per-pupil spending (California districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
812
Total Enrollment
4
Schools
$14,649
Per-Pupil Spending
Elementary, Middle
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Antelope Elementary operates 4 public schools serving 812 students, placing it among the smallest districts in California. The school portfolio breaks down into 3 elementary, 1 middle schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Tehama County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $14,649 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the lower half of 1880 California districts by per-pupil spending. See how California compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 18.7% local, 70.5% state, and 10.8% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 50/100, ranked #773 of 1526 in California against a state average of 50, in line with the typical spread seen across the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
and 34.1% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 72.5% White, 19.4% Hispanic or Latino, 0.4% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Antelope Elementary, with a diversity index of 53.5/100.
Its largest campus is Antelope Elementary, enrolling 442 students (56% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Plum Valley Elementary, at 20 students, a 22x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Antelope Elementary accounts for 54.4% of all Antelope Elementary student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Antelope Elementary a distant remainder — means Antelope Elementary-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: elementary. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
Antelope Elementary school enrollment varies 22× across entities
Antelope Elementary school enrollment ranges from 20 students (lowest) to 442 students (highest), a spread of 422 students. That spread is wider than typical and predicts noticeable gaps in service quality between the highest and lowest areas. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
The reported share clears the 50% majority mark. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Antelope Elementary chronic absenteeism rate is 34.1% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.