An equity score of 64/100 ranks Propel Cs-Braddock Hills #176 of 649 districts in Pennsylvania (state average 49). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $20,419 per pupil, Propel Cs-Braddock Hills ranks #155 of 672 Pennsylvania districts by per-pupil spending (Pennsylvania districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
797
Total Enrollment
1
Schools
$20,419
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Propel Cs-Braddock Hills operates 1 public schools serving 797 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Pennsylvania. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Allegheny County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $20,419 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 672 Pennsylvania districts by per-pupil spending. See how Pennsylvania compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 90.8% local, 0.8% state, and 8.4% federal, a local-revenue-heavy mix that leaves the district more exposed to property-tax swings and local ballot measures than state-funded peers. The district's equity score is 64/100, ranked #176 of 649 in Pennsylvania against a state average of 49, notably more even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
a 336.5:1 student-counselor ratio, well above the ASCA benchmark though still under the roughly 408:1 national average, and 63.3% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 80.8% African American, 5.8% White, 2.2% Hispanic or Latino across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Propel Cs-Braddock Hills, enrolling 673 students (100% of the district's total enrollment).
Propel Cs-Braddock Hills accounts for 84.4% of all Propel Cs-Braddock Hills student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Propel Cs-Braddock Hills a distant remainder — means Propel Cs-Braddock Hills-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
The reported share is above 87.5%, so economic need is widespread across the measured student population. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Propel Cs-Braddock Hills student-counselor ratio is 337:1 — near the typical range (US average ~408) — within the typical range for U.S. public districts
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Variation between sub-units within Propel Cs-Braddock Hills is typically wider than the Propel Cs-Braddock Hills-aggregate figure suggests.
Propel Cs-Braddock Hills chronic absenteeism rate is 63.3% — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.