Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Hammond, Montana - 2 schools
At $9,842 per pupil, Hawks Home Elem ranks #376 of 394 Montana districts by per-pupil spending (Montana districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
12
Total Enrollment
2
Schools
$9,842
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Hawks Home Elem operates 2 public schools serving 12 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Montana. The school portfolio breaks down into 2 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Carter County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $9,842 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, among the bottom 40 of 394 Montana districts by per-pupil spending. See how Montana compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 45.5% local, 47.7% state, and 6.8% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one.
. Demographically, the student body averages 100.0% White across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Hawks Home School, enrolling 5 students (63% of the district's total enrollment).
Hawks Home School accounts for 41.7% of all Hawks Home Elem student enrollment
That dominant concentration means Hawks Home Elem-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: combined. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.