Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Lebanon, Ohio - 1 schools
An equity score of 24/100 ranks Greater Ohio Virtual School #730 of 806 districts in Ohio (state average 46). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $6,954 per pupil, Greater Ohio Virtual School ranks #965 of 966 Ohio districts by per-pupil spending (Ohio districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
628
Total Enrollment
1
Schools
$6,954
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Greater Ohio Virtual School operates 1 public schools serving 628 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Ohio. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Warren County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $6,954 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, among the bottom 97 of 966 Ohio districts by per-pupil spending. See how Ohio compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 1.8% local, 84.3% state, and 13.9% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles. The district's equity score is 24/100, ranked #730 of 806 in Ohio against a state average of 46, notably less even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
a 371.6:1 student-counselor ratio, well above the ASCA benchmark though still under the roughly 408:1 national average, and 3.6% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 87.2% White, 5.4% Hispanic or Latino, 1.6% African American across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Greater Ohio Virtual School, enrolling 576 students (100% of the district's total enrollment).
Greater Ohio Virtual School accounts for 91.7% of all Greater Ohio Virtual School student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Greater Ohio Virtual School a distant remainder — means Greater Ohio Virtual School-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: combined. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.
Greater Ohio Virtual School student-counselor ratio is 372:1 — high (typically associated with staffing constraints that limit per-student counselor time; CRDC data shows higher ratios cluster in larger urban systems)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.
Greater Ohio Virtual School chronic absenteeism rate is 3.6% — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.