Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal
records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our
editorial standards & corrections policy, the
methodology behind these numbers, or
report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.
Dillon, Montana - 1 schools
At $39,333 per pupil, Grant Elem ranks #22 of 394 Montana districts by per-pupil spending (Montana districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
3
Total Enrollment
1
Schools
$39,333
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Grant Elem operates 1 public schools serving 3 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Montana. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Beaverhead County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $39,333 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, among the top 40 of 394 Montana districts by per-pupil spending. See how Montana compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 41.1% local, 38.8% state, and 20.2% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one.
. Demographically, the student body averages 100.0% White across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Grant School, enrolling 7 students (100% of the district's total enrollment).
Grant School accounts for 100.0% of all Grant Elem student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Grant Elem a distant remainder — means Grant Elem-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: combined. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.