At $13,968 per pupil, Gracemont ranks #151 of 540 Oklahoma districts by per-pupil spending (Oklahoma districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
125
Total Enrollment
2
Schools
$13,968
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Gracemont operates 2 public schools serving 125 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Oklahoma. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined, 1 high schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Caddo County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $13,968 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 540 Oklahoma districts by per-pupil spending. See how Oklahoma compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 20.6% local, 47.2% state, and 32.2% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one.
a 120:1 student-counselor ratio, that meets the ASCA-recommended benchmark, and 36.6% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 33.9% White, 7.4% Hispanic or Latino, 2.8% African American across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Gracemont Es, enrolling 120 students (78% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Gracemont Hs, at 33 students, a 4x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Enrollment across the district's NCES-reporting campuses grew 4.8% between 2022-23 and 2023-24 (125 to 131 students), while the student-teacher ratio held roughly steady, per the NCES Common Core of Data annual universe files.
Of the district's $1,749,000 in reported FY2023 expenditures, 55.9% went to instruction, 36.7% to support services, and 0.1% to capital outlay, support-services-heavy relative to typical districts, reflecting spending on transportation, administration, or student services. Figures come from the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey's function-level breakdown, not the aggregate per-pupil figure above.
Gracemont Es accounts for 78.4% of all Gracemont student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Gracemont a distant remainder — means Gracemont-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
Gracemont student-counselor ratio is 120:1 — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.
Gracemont chronic absenteeism rate is 36.6% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.