An equity score of 85/100 ranks Crosbyton Cisd #41 of 1047 districts in Texas (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $17,308 per pupil, Crosbyton Cisd ranks #184 of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending (Texas districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
305
Total Enrollment
2
Schools
$17,308
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Crosbyton Cisd operates 2 public schools serving 305 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Texas. The school portfolio breaks down into 2 combined schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Crosby County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $17,308 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 1207 Texas districts by per-pupil spending. See how Texas compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 28.8% local, 48.7% state, and 22.5% federal, a balanced mix across local, state, and federal sources, spreading budget risk across funding cycles rather than concentrating it in one. The district's equity score is 85/100, ranked #41 of 1047 in Texas against a state average of 50, notably more even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
a 316:1 student-counselor ratio, somewhat above the 250:1 ASCA recommendation, and 21.0% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 75.9% Hispanic or Latino, 20.3% White, 2.2% African American across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Crosbyton Cisd Pre K-12, enrolling 316 students (97% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Sp Ed Co-Op, at 10 students, a 32x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Crosbyton Cisd Pre K-12 accounts for 96.9% of all Crosbyton Cisd student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Crosbyton Cisd a distant remainder — means Crosbyton Cisd-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
The reported share is at least 75%, indicating a high concentration of measured economic need. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Crosbyton Cisd student-counselor ratio is 316:1 — near the typical range (US average ~408) — within the typical range for U.S. public districts
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Variation between sub-units within Crosbyton Cisd is typically wider than the Crosbyton Cisd-aggregate figure suggests.
Crosbyton Cisd chronic absenteeism rate is 21.0% — near the typical range (US average ~28) — aligned with the national post-pandemic baseline of roughly 28% chronic absenteeism
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Variation between sub-units within Crosbyton Cisd is typically wider than the Crosbyton Cisd-aggregate figure suggests.