At $19,357 per pupil, Bridger K-12 Schools ranks #143 of 393 Montana districts by per-pupil spending (Montana districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
199
Total Enrollment
3
Schools
$19,357
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, High
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Bridger K-12 Schools operates 3 public schools serving 199 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Montana. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined, 1 high, 1 middle schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Carbon County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $19,357 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 393 Montana districts by per-pupil spending. See how Montana compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 55.9% local, 29.2% state, and 14.9% federal, a local-revenue-heavy mix that leaves the district more exposed to property-tax swings and local ballot measures than state-funded peers.
Academic infrastructure includes 1 of 3 schools offering Advanced Placement (4 AP courses district-wide), a 106.9:1 student-counselor ratio, that meets the ASCA-recommended benchmark, and 32.7% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 91.9% White, 2.3% Hispanic or Latino, 1.1% African American across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Bridger High School, with a diversity index of 24.9/100.
Its largest campus is Bridger Elementary School, enrolling 114 students (56% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Bridger 7-8, at 31 students, a 4x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Bridger Elementary School accounts for 56.2% of all Bridger K-12 Schools student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Bridger K-12 Schools a distant remainder — means Bridger K-12 Schools-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
Bridger K-12 Schools school enrollment varies 3.7× across entities
Bridger K-12 Schools school enrollment ranges from 31 students (lowest) to 114 students (highest), a spread of 83 students. That relatively narrow ratio reflects an unusually homogeneous campus portfolio, most districts have a wider mix of school sizes. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
Bridger K-12 Schools student-counselor ratio is 107:1 — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.
Bridger K-12 Schools chronic absenteeism rate is 32.7% — high (typically associated with higher-than-average disruption; recent CRDC data showed elevated rates persisting after pandemic-era schooling changes)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Higher values may reflect larger urban scale or recent resource constraints that have widened the gap.