2024-25 NCES data Other / mixed grade configuration NCES 292340002565
Lutie High — Theodosia, MO
Federal NCES profile for Lutie High, including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators — Resource Investment Index 45/100.
How this works: Each indicator above is scored 0–100 from federal NCES and CRDC data, then averaged into the Resource Investment Index. This measures resource allocation — staffing, programs, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes. Full methodology →
The verdict
Lutie High earns a D Resource Investment Index (45/100), even as it posts class sizes smaller than 97% of Missouri schools.
Public location data per NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) Common Core of Data. Verify the school's current address on the
NCES CCD record.
Enrollment
58
Missouri · 2024-25 NCES data
Teachers (FTE)
10.0
Federal CCD staff survey
Students per teacher
5.3:1
vs 12.9:1 Missouri avg
▲-59% vs state
Free-lunch eligible
94.3%
vs 46.1% Missouri avg
▲+105% vs state
Student-teacher ratio in context
How Lutie High compares with Missouri and U.S. medians
Smaller classes than state median
12.9:1 Missouri median15.7:1 U.S. median
The federal record — no proprietary index, no editorial formula.
PlainSchools publishes the actual federal measurements — enrollment, staffing, demographics, discipline, and finance — straight from the NCES Common Core of Data, CRDC, and F-33 surveys. No composite rating, no opinion-based score on top. You get the same raw numbers researchers and policymakers use, with benchmarks, spending context, and equity indicators computed from the same federal datasets. Full methodology linked below.
What this school's NCES data tells you
Lutie High reports 58 enrolled students to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) alongside 10.0 full-time-equivalent teachers, producing a 5.3:1 student-teacher ratio. That figure sits 59% below the Missouri state mean of 12.9:1, signalling more teacher attention per pupil than the state benchmark. Against the national 2024-25 average of 15.7:1, it is 66% lower, a useful calibration for families comparing districts across state lines.
Title I and federal lunch eligibility offer another window into the student body: 94.3% of pupils qualify for free meals, a proxy for household income that federal programs use to direct funding. The free-lunch share is 105% above the Missouri average and 82% above the national baseline. Counselor coverage works out to roughly 145 students per counselor, meeting the American School Counselor Association recommendation of 250:1. Chronic absenteeism — missing 10% or more of school days — stands at 39.7% according to the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection.
On the finance side, the surrounding Lutie R-Vi spends $18,298 per pupil district-wide, above the Missouri average of $12,931 and above the national average of $16,593. Revenue comes 56.3% from local sources (property taxes), 25.8% from the state, and 17.9% from federal programs per the NCES F-33 finance survey. Taken together, these measurements produce a Resource Investment Index of 45/100 (D), calculated from 4 distinct NCES and CRDC indicators measuring resource allocation rather than academic outcomes.
Cross-validating school-level NCES values against Missouri state and U.S. national means lets readers see whether this school is an outlier or in line with peers.
Metric
This school
vs Missouri
Missouri avg
U.S. avg
Students per teacher
5.3:1
▼ 59%
12.9:1
15.7:1
Free-lunch eligible
94.3%
▲ 105%
46.1%
51.8%
Enrollment
58
top 7%
—
—
Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25
Class size vs. every US school
Students per teacher (lower means more individual attention)
5Among the smallest classessmaller classes than 98% of 92,598 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
School size vs. every US school
Total enrollment — where this school sits by size (neither large nor small is 'better')
58larger than 6% of 95,891 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
What the federal data reveals about equity at this school
Federal measurements — not ratings — surface the resource and opportunity picture. Below are the indicators that researchers, civil-rights monitors, and funding formulas use to assess equity.
Economic need
94.3%
free-lunch eligible
— 105% above the Missouri average of 46.1%
Above the 40% Title I schoolwide threshold — federal funds support the whole school, not individual students.
Staffing depth
5.3:1
students per teacher
— 59% below state mean
Top 3% in Missouri — lower ratio than 97% of state schools
Below the 15:1 benchmark — typical of schools with smaller class sizes and more individualized attention.
Engagement
39.7%
chronically absent (missed 10%+ of school days)
Chronic absenteeism at or above 20% — the CDC threshold for "high" — signals significant barriers to regular attendance.
Funding equity
$18,298
per pupil, district-wide
— above Missouri avg of $12,931
Above the U.S. public-school average, reflecting higher local or state investment per enrolled student.
Support staff
Counselors0.4 FTE
Per 145 students — the combined health-and-guidance staffing load for this school.
Discipline context
18
in-school suspensions + 20 out-of-school
Suspension rate: 31.0 per 100 students. Combined in-school and out-of-school rate: 65.5 per 100 students. Reported via the Civil Rights Data Collection. Includes 20 expulsions.
Overview
Enrollment58 Top 7% in Missouri — larger than 93% of 2,321 state schools
Teachers (FTE)10.0
Students per teacher 5.3:1 -59% vs state
Free-lunch eligible 94.3% +105% vs state
NCES ID292340002565
Student demographics
White
94.8% · ≈55 students
Two or More
5.2% · ≈3 students
White94.8%
Two or More5.2%
Largest group: White at 94.8% of enrollment.
Programs & staff
Counselors (FTE)0.4
Students per counselor145:1
Discipline & special education
Chronically absent39.7%
In-school suspensions18
Out-of-school suspensions20
Expulsions20
Funding & spending
District-wide per-pupil expenditure for Lutie R-Vi, which includes Lutie High.
$18,298
Per student
+42%
vs Missouri
Avg $12,931
+10%
vs U.S.
Avg $16,593
Revenue mix
Local56.3%
State25.8%
Federal17.9%
Source: NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey District-level finance · FY 2021-22 Per-pupil expenditure reflects the district-wide average. Individual school budgets are not reported at the federal level.
Lutie High has 58 students enrolled. It is a other school in THEODOSIA, MO.
What is the student-teacher ratio at Lutie High?
The student-teacher ratio at Lutie High is 5.3:1, which is 59% lower than the Missouri average of 12.9:1 and 66% lower than the national average of 15.7:1. Lower ratios generally mean more individual attention per student.
What percentage of students receive free lunch at Lutie High?
94.3% of students at Lutie High are eligible for free lunch, compared to the Missouri average of 46.1%.
What is the racial and ethnic makeup of Lutie High?
The largest demographic group at Lutie High is White at 94.8%. The school serves a student body in THEODOSIA, MO.
What is the Resource Investment Index for Lutie High?
Lutie High has a Resource Investment Index of 45/100 (D) based on 4 factors: student-teacher ratio, counselor availability, attendance rates. This index measures federal resource allocation — staffing levels, program availability, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes.
Is Lutie High a good school?
Lutie High earns a D Resource Investment Index (45/100), even as it posts class sizes smaller than 97% of Missouri schools. The Resource Investment Index reflects staffing, counselor access, gifted programs, and attendance reported to NCES, not test scores or academic outcomes, so treat it as a resource snapshot rather than an overall rating.