Enrollment
48
Missouri · 2024-25 NCES data
Federal NCES profile for Cainsville Elem., including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators — Resource Investment Index 65/100.
The verdict
Cainsville Elem. earns a B- Resource Investment Index (65/100), with class sizes smaller than 92% of Missouri schools.
Public location data per NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) Common Core of Data. Verify the school's current address on the NCES CCD record.
Enrollment
48
Missouri · 2024-25 NCES data
Teachers (FTE)
6.0
Federal CCD staff survey
Students per teacher
7.8:1
vs 12.9:1 Missouri avg
-40% vs state
Free-lunch eligible
51.1%
vs 46.1% Missouri avg
+11% vs state
How Cainsville Elem. compares with Missouri and U.S. medians
Smaller classes than state median
7.8:1 — 5.1 below the Missouri state median of 12.9:1, indicating smaller average class loads than typical schools in the state.
Cainsville Elem. reports 48 enrolled students to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) alongside 6.0 full-time-equivalent teachers, producing a 7.8:1 student-teacher ratio. That figure sits 40% below the Missouri state mean of 12.9:1, signalling more teacher attention per pupil than the state benchmark. Against the national 2024-25 average of 15.7:1, it is 50% lower, a useful calibration for families comparing districts across state lines.
Title I and federal lunch eligibility offer another window into the student body: 51.1% of pupils qualify for free meals, a proxy for household income that federal programs use to direct funding. The free-lunch share is 11% above the Missouri average and 1% below the national baseline. Counselor coverage works out to roughly 96 students per counselor, meeting the American School Counselor Association recommendation of 250:1. Chronic absenteeism — missing 10% or more of school days — stands at 8.3% according to the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection.
On the finance side, the surrounding Cainsville R-I spends $13,769 per pupil district-wide, above the Missouri average of $12,931 and below the national average of $16,593. Revenue comes 37.2% from local sources (property taxes), 45.8% from the state, and 17.0% from federal programs per the NCES F-33 finance survey. Taken together, these measurements produce a Resource Investment Index of 65/100 (B-), calculated from 4 distinct NCES and CRDC indicators measuring resource allocation rather than academic outcomes.
Source: National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data + CRDC + F-33 · 2024-25
Cross-validating school-level NCES values against Missouri state and U.S. national means lets readers see whether this school is an outlier or in line with peers.
| Metric | This school | vs Missouri | Missouri avg | U.S. avg |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Students per teacher | 7.8:1 | ▼ 40% | 12.9:1 | 15.7:1 |
| Free-lunch eligible | 51.1% | ▲ 11% | 46.1% | 51.8% |
| Enrollment | 48 | top 6% | — | — |
Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25
Class size vs. every US school
Students per teacher (lower means more individual attention)
8 Among the smallest classes smaller classes than 96% of 92,598 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
School size vs. every US school
Total enrollment — where this school sits by size (neither large nor small is 'better')
48 larger than 5% of 95,891 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
Federal measurements — not ratings — surface the resource and opportunity picture. Below are the indicators that researchers, civil-rights monitors, and funding formulas use to assess equity.
Largest group: White at 100.0% of enrollment.
District-wide per-pupil expenditure for Cainsville R-I, which includes Cainsville Elem..
Source: NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey District-level finance · FY 2021-22 Per-pupil expenditure reflects the district-wide average. Individual school budgets are not reported at the federal level.
1 comparable other schools (grades Mixed) serving the same city.
In-depth guides on understanding NCES data, school choice, and education funding.
How CCD, CRDC and EDFacts feed every public-school number you see.
Eight signals that matter more than the overall ranking number.
Title I, F-33, state aid formulas and what per-pupil spending really means.
Why missing 10% of school matters and how it varies by district.
Three school types, three funding models, three sets of trade-offs.
What CRDC suspension and expulsion records do and don't reveal.
Cainsville Elem. has 48 students enrolled. It is a other school in CAINSVILLE, MO.
The student-teacher ratio at Cainsville Elem. is 7.8:1, which is 40% lower than the Missouri average of 12.9:1 and 50% lower than the national average of 15.7:1. Lower ratios generally mean more individual attention per student.
51.1% of students at Cainsville Elem. are eligible for free lunch, compared to the Missouri average of 46.1%.
The largest demographic group at Cainsville Elem. is White at 100.0%. The school serves a student body in CAINSVILLE, MO.
Cainsville Elem. has a Resource Investment Index of 65/100 (B-) based on 4 factors: student-teacher ratio, counselor availability, attendance rates. This index measures federal resource allocation — staffing levels, program availability, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes.
Cainsville Elem. earns a B- Resource Investment Index (65/100), with class sizes smaller than 92% of Missouri schools. The Resource Investment Index reflects staffing, counselor access, gifted programs, and attendance reported to NCES, not test scores or academic outcomes, so treat it as a resource snapshot rather than an overall rating.