Lebanon County Ctc operates 1 public schools serving 7 students, placing it among the smallest districts in Pennsylvania. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 high schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Lebanon County.
The funding mix is 60.4% local, 17.3% state, and 22.3% federal, a local-revenue-heavy mix that leaves the district more exposed to property-tax swings and local ballot measures than state-funded peers.
a 4.5:1 student-counselor ratio, that meets the ASCA-recommended benchmark, . Demographically, the student body averages 88.9% White, 11.1% Hispanic or Latino across the district's schools.
Its largest campus is Lebanon County Ctc, enrolling 9 students (100% of the district's total enrollment).
Lebanon County Ctc accounts for 100.0% of all Lebanon County Ctc student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Lebanon County Ctc a distant remainder — means Lebanon County Ctc-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: high. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Because it contains a majority of the affected population, enrollment-weighted aggregates will sit closer to this entity's reported fields than to those of smaller peers; an unweighted entity count answers a different question.
Lebanon County Ctc student-counselor ratio is 5:1 — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)
student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.