An equity score of 73/100 ranks Geyserville Unified #231 of 1526 districts in California (state average 50). Derived live from how evenly resources are distributed across the district's schools.
At $25,682 per pupil, Geyserville Unified ranks #157 of 1880 California districts by per-pupil spending (California districts). NCES F-33 finance data.
211
Total Enrollment
3
Schools
$25,682
Per-Pupil Spending
Combined, Elementary
School Types
District-Level NCES Analysis
Geyserville Unified operates 3 public schools serving 211 students, placing it among the smallest districts in California. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 combined, 1 elementary, 1 high schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Sonoma County.
Per-pupil expenditure runs $25,682 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, among the top 188 of 1880 California districts by per-pupil spending. See how California compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 73.7% local, 20.5% state, and 5.8% federal, a local-revenue-heavy mix that leaves the district more exposed to property-tax swings and local ballot measures than state-funded peers. The district's equity score is 73/100, ranked #231 of 1526 in California against a state average of 50, notably more even than the typical district in the state for how evenly funding reaches its schools.
Academic infrastructure includes 1 of 3 schools offering Advanced Placement (1 AP courses district-wide), and 56.5% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 65.5% Hispanic or Latino, 30.1% White, 0.7% Asian across the district's schools. Its most demographically mixed campus is Geyserville Elementary, with a diversity index of 52.6/100.
Its largest campus is Geyserville New Tech Academy, enrolling 97 students (50% of the district's total enrollment). Its smallest is Buena Vista High, at 8 students, a 12x enrollment spread across the district's campuses.
Geyserville New Tech Academy accounts for 46.0% of all Geyserville Unified student enrollment
That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Geyserville Unified a distant remainder — means Geyserville Unified-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the largest entity. Grade band: combined. The share measures enrollment concentration only; it does not establish how the district allocates programs, capital, or staff. Enrollment-weighted aggregates give this entity more weight than any smaller peer, while an unweighted entity average treats every record equally.
Geyserville Unified school enrollment varies 12× across entities
Geyserville Unified school enrollment ranges from 8 students (lowest) to 97 students (highest), a spread of 89 students. That spread reflects typical mixed-portfolio variation between specialty programs and large neighbourhood schools. Per-school staffing ratios, programme availability, and capital-renovation cycles often diverge inside the same district based on enrollment shape.
The reported share clears the 50% majority mark. Title I operates under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015), but its statutory allocation uses additional LEA-level counts and rules not represented by this average. This percentage is an economic-need context measure; it does not establish a Title I award, show dollars received, or describe how funds are distributed among campuses.
Geyserville Unified chronic absenteeism rate is 56.5% — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)
chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.