Alternatives in Action District

Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal records, no number is typed in by an editor. District totals are aggregated directly from the schools reporting under this district in the source records. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of June 2026.

Oakland, California - 1 schools

At $16,193 per pupil, Alternatives in Action District ranks #700 of 1862 California districts by per-pupil spending (California districts). NCES F-33 finance data.

143
Total Enrollment
1
Schools
$16,193
Per-Pupil Spending
High
School Types

District-Level NCES Analysis

Alternatives in Action District operates 1 public schools serving 143 students, placing it among the smallest districts in California. The school portfolio breaks down into 1 high schools, a small enough portfolio that most families will interact with nearly every campus in the district at some point. These enrollment and school figures come from the NCES Common Core of Data (CCD) 2024-25 release, and the district is based in Alameda County.

Per-pupil expenditure runs $16,193 according to the NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey, in the upper half of 1862 California districts by per-pupil spending. See how California compares in our national per-pupil spending analysis. The funding mix is 28.7% local, 55.2% state, and 16.1% federal, a state-revenue-heavy mix that insulates the district somewhat from local property-tax volatility, though it ties funding to state budget cycles.

a 106:1 student-counselor ratio, that meets the ASCA-recommended benchmark, and 69.8% chronic absenteeism from the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection. Demographically, the student body averages 83.0% Hispanic or Latino, 8.5% African American across the district's schools.

Its largest campus is Alternatives in Action, enrolling 106 students (100% of the district's total enrollment).

Alternatives in Action accounts for 74.1% of all Alternatives in Action District student enrollment

That is an overwhelming concentration, leaving the rest of Alternatives in Action District a distant remainder — means Alternatives in Action District-wide averages can mask substantial variation outside the dominant entity. Grade band: high. A single dominant campus often anchors a district's program offerings and staffing patterns; the share helps explain why district-wide averages may not reflect the typical neighbourhood-school experience. When one entity dominates a region's footprint, its programmatic and budget decisions effectively set policy for a majority of the affected population.

Source: NCES Common Core of Data NCES Common Core of Data

Alternatives in Action District has higher-than-average Title I eligibility — 74.8% of the population qualifies for free or reduced-price lunch

free or reduced-price lunch eligibility is the federal threshold for Title I funding allocations, established under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA, 2015). Eligibility here is approaching the 75% concentration-grant threshold; it does not yet unlock the extra funding tier but sits meaningfully above the baseline 50% majority mark. Regions with eligibility this high typically draw a substantially larger federal funding share relative to their local tax base, which can either offset or reinforce existing gaps depending on allocation policy.

Source: ESSA Title I Part A; ED EDFacts file system ESSA Title I Part A; ED EDFacts file system

Alternatives in Action District student-counselor ratio is 106:1 — well below typical (typically associated with unusually small scale or exceptionally high per-unit investment)

student-counselor ratio is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: the ratio counts FTE counselors against total enrollment, districts that contract intervention or social-emotional staff outside the counselor classification may be under-counted Values this far below typical often correlate with unusually small scale or population characteristics rather than higher resource budgets per se — worth checking whether the underlying denominator is itself an outlier.

Source: NCES Civil Rights Data Collection NCES Civil Rights Data Collection

Alternatives in Action District chronic absenteeism rate is 69.8% — well above typical (typically associated with unusually large scale or acute resource constraints)

chronic absenteeism rate is the simplest comparative metric but it does not capture the full picture: a student is chronically absent if they miss ≥10% of enrolled days for any reason, illness, family obligations, or disengagement Values this far above typical often signal acute resource constraints or a structurally different scale than most peers — worth reading alongside the underlying counts, not the ratio alone.

Source: NCES Civil Rights Data Collection 2021-22 NCES Civil Rights Data Collection 2021-22

Where does the funding come from?

16.1%
Federal
55.2%
State
28.7%
Local

Student Demographics

Average demographic composition across 1 schools in Alternatives in Action District.

Hispanic or Latino 83.0%
African American 8.5%
Multiracial 8.5%

Source: NCES CCD School Membership 2024-25.

Programs & Resources

106:1
Student-Counselor Ratio
69.8%
Chronically Absent

Source: NCES Civil Rights Data Collection (CRDC) 2021-22.

Schools in Alternatives in Action District

School Enrollment
Alternatives in Action
Charter
106

How Alternatives in Action District Compares to Similar-Size Districts

The California districts closest to this one in total enrollment.

District Enrollment Spending Funding Mix
Insight @ San Diego District Similar size Lower spending Less locally funded
Leadership Military Academy District Similar size Higher spending Less locally funded
Thompson Peak Charter District Similar size Lower spending Similar funding mix
Paradise Charter Middle District Similar size Lower spending Similar funding mix
Jcs - Pine Valley District Similar size Lower spending Similar funding mix

Comparisons are relative to Alternatives in Action District's own figures; each column derives from NCES Common Core of Data and the F-33 Finance Survey.

Nearby Districts in California

Top districts in the same state, compare side-by-side for enrollment, spending, and demographics.

Los Angeles Unified
427,795 students · 785 schools · $21,940/pupil
Compare vs Alternatives in Action District →
San Diego Unified
93,893 students · 175 schools · $18,665/pupil
Compare vs Alternatives in Action District →
Fresno Unified
69,668 students · 101 schools · $18,783/pupil
Compare vs Alternatives in Action District →
Long Beach Unified
65,554 students · 84 schools · $16,028/pupil
Compare vs Alternatives in Action District →
Elk Grove Unified
62,061 students · 67 schools · $14,134/pupil
Compare vs Alternatives in Action District →

Compare Alternatives in Action District

See how this district compares to others in enrollment, spending, demographics, and academic resources.

Compare vs Los Angeles Unified →

Frequently Asked Questions

How many schools are in Alternatives in Action District?

Alternatives in Action District has 1 school, including 1 high. Total enrollment is 143 students.

How much does Alternatives in Action District spend per student?

Alternatives in Action District spends $16,193 per student.

What is the demographic composition of Alternatives in Action District?

Alternatives in Action District students are 83.0% Hispanic or Latino, 8.5% African American, averaged across 1 school. Source: NCES CCD Membership 2024-25.