2024-25 NCES data Middle school (grades 6-8) NCES 300093201025
Shields Valley 7-8 — Clyde Park, MT
Federal NCES profile for Shields Valley 7-8, including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators — Resource Investment Index 52/100.
How this works: Each indicator above is scored 0–100 from federal NCES and CRDC data, then averaged into the Resource Investment Index. This measures resource allocation — staffing, programs, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes. Full methodology →
The verdict
Shields Valley 7-8 earns a C- Resource Investment Index (52/100), with class sizes larger than 94% of Montana schools.
Public location data per NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) Common Core of Data. Verify the school's current address on the
NCES CCD record.
Enrollment
32
Montana · 2024-25 NCES data
Teachers (FTE)
2.0
Federal CCD staff survey
Students per teacher
18:1
vs 12.1:1 Montana avg
▼+49% vs state
Student-teacher ratio in context
How Shields Valley 7-8 compares with Montana and U.S. medians
Larger classes than state median
12.1:1 Montana median15.7:1 U.S. median
The federal record — no proprietary index, no editorial formula.
PlainSchools publishes the actual federal measurements — enrollment, staffing, demographics, discipline, and finance — straight from the NCES Common Core of Data, CRDC, and F-33 surveys. No composite rating, no opinion-based score on top. You get the same raw numbers researchers and policymakers use, with benchmarks, spending context, and equity indicators computed from the same federal datasets. Full methodology linked below.
What this school's NCES data tells you
Shields Valley 7-8 reports 32 enrolled students to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) alongside 2.0 full-time-equivalent teachers, producing a 18:1 student-teacher ratio. That figure sits 49% above the Montana state mean of 12.1:1, signalling larger average class loads than peers in the same state. Against the national 2024-25 average of 15.7:1, it is 15% higher, a useful calibration for families comparing districts across state lines.
Counselor coverage works out to roughly 6 students per counselor, meeting the American School Counselor Association recommendation of 250:1. Chronic absenteeism — missing 10% or more of school days — stands at 18.8% according to the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection.
On the finance side, the surrounding Shields Valley Elem spends $12,907 per pupil district-wide, below the Montana average of $19,282 and below the national average of $16,593. Revenue comes 47.8% from local sources (property taxes), 40.0% from the state, and 12.2% from federal programs per the NCES F-33 finance survey. Taken together, these measurements produce a Resource Investment Index of 52/100 (C-), calculated from 4 distinct NCES and CRDC indicators measuring resource allocation rather than academic outcomes.
Cross-validating school-level NCES values against Montana state and U.S. national means lets readers see whether this school is an outlier or in line with peers.
Metric
This school
vs Montana
Montana avg
U.S. avg
Students per teacher
18:1
▲ 49%
12.1:1
15.7:1
Enrollment
32
top 30%
—
—
Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25
Class size vs. every US school
Students per teacher (lower means more individual attention)
18smaller classes than 24% of 92,598 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
School size vs. every US school
Total enrollment — where this school sits by size (neither large nor small is 'better')
32larger than 4% of 95,891 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
What the federal data reveals about equity at this school
Federal measurements — not ratings — surface the resource and opportunity picture. Below are the indicators that researchers, civil-rights monitors, and funding formulas use to assess equity.
Staffing depth
18:1
students per teacher
— 49% above state mean
Top 94% in Montana — lower ratio than 6% of state schools
Between 15:1 and 20:1 — in line with the typical U.S. public-school staffing range.
Engagement
18.8%
chronically absent (missed 10%+ of school days)
Between 10–20% — above the pre-pandemic baseline of ~15% nationally but within the current U.S. range.
Funding equity
$12,907
per pupil, district-wide
— below Montana avg of $19,282
Below the U.S. average per-pupil spend — funding constraints may affect programs, facilities, and staffing.
Support staff
Counselors5.5 FTE
Per 6 students — the combined health-and-guidance staffing load for this school.
Discipline context
0
in-school suspensions + 0 out-of-school
Suspension rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Combined in-school and out-of-school rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Reported via the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Overview
Enrollment32 Top 30% in Montana — larger than 70% of 826 state schools
Teachers (FTE)2.0
Students per teacher 18:1 +49% vs state
Free-lunch eligible —
NCES ID300093201025
Student demographics
White
90.6% · ≈29 students
Hispanic or Latino
6.3% · ≈2 students
Two or More
3.1% · ≈1 students
White90.6%
Hispanic or Latino6.3%
Two or More3.1%
Largest group: White at 90.6% of enrollment.
Programs & staff
Counselors (FTE)5.5
Students per counselor6:1
Discipline & special education
Chronically absent18.8%
In-school suspensions0
Out-of-school suspensions0
Funding & spending
District-wide per-pupil expenditure for Shields Valley Elem, which includes Shields Valley 7-8.
$12,907
Per student
-33%
vs Montana
Avg $19,282
-22%
vs U.S.
Avg $16,593
Revenue mix
Local47.8%
State40.0%
Federal12.2%
Source: NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey District-level finance · FY 2021-22 Per-pupil expenditure reflects the district-wide average. Individual school budgets are not reported at the federal level.
Treat this page as the federal baseline — then verify locally.
Compare Shields Valley 7-8 side-by-side with another school you're considering on the same NCES measures. Compare schools →
Read the district context — spending per pupil, staffing, and equity ranking are district-level decisions that shape this school. District profile →
Confirm current enrollment windows, programs, and boundaries with the school directly — federal data lags the current school year. Choosing guide →
Figures are the school's reported federal record (CCD 2024-25, CRDC 2021-22) — coverage varies by entity type, and PlainSchools does not rate or rank schools.
Frequently asked questions about Shields Valley 7-8
How many students attend Shields Valley 7-8?
Shields Valley 7-8 has 32 students enrolled. It is a middle school in Clyde Park, MT.
What is the student-teacher ratio at Shields Valley 7-8?
The student-teacher ratio at Shields Valley 7-8 is 18:1, which is 49% higher than the Montana average of 12.1:1 and 15% higher than the national average of 15.7:1.
What is the racial and ethnic makeup of Shields Valley 7-8?
The largest demographic group at Shields Valley 7-8 is White at 90.6%. The school serves a student body in Clyde Park, MT.
What is the Resource Investment Index for Shields Valley 7-8?
Shields Valley 7-8 has a Resource Investment Index of 52/100 (C-) based on 4 factors: student-teacher ratio, counselor availability, attendance rates. This index measures federal resource allocation — staffing levels, program availability, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes.
Is Shields Valley 7-8 a good school?
Shields Valley 7-8 earns a C- Resource Investment Index (52/100), with class sizes larger than 94% of Montana schools. The Resource Investment Index reflects staffing, counselor access, gifted programs, and attendance reported to NCES, not test scores or academic outcomes, so treat it as a resource snapshot rather than an overall rating.