2024-25 NCES data Elementary school (grades K-5) NCES 060233713690 Charter school
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter — Pine Mountain Club, CA
Federal NCES profile for Peak to Peak Mountain Charter, including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators — Resource Investment Index 18/100.
How this works: Each indicator above is scored 0–100 from federal NCES and CRDC data, then averaged into the Resource Investment Index. This measures resource allocation — staffing, programs, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes. Full methodology →
The verdict
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter earns an F Resource Investment Index (18/100), even as it posts class sizes smaller than 80% of California schools.
Public location data per NCES (National Center for Education Statistics) Common Core of Data. Verify the school's current address on the
NCES CCD record.
Enrollment
54
California · 2024-25 NCES data
Teachers (FTE)
3.0
Federal CCD staff survey
Students per teacher
18.7:1
vs 21.6:1 California avg
▲-13% vs state
Free-lunch eligible
19.6%
vs 55.5% California avg
▲-65% vs state
Student-teacher ratio in context
How Peak to Peak Mountain Charter compares with California and U.S. medians
Smaller classes than state median
21.6:1 California median15.7:1 U.S. median
The federal record — no proprietary index, no editorial formula.
PlainSchools publishes the actual federal measurements — enrollment, staffing, demographics, discipline, and finance — straight from the NCES Common Core of Data, CRDC, and F-33 surveys. No composite rating, no opinion-based score on top. You get the same raw numbers researchers and policymakers use, with benchmarks, spending context, and equity indicators computed from the same federal datasets. Full methodology linked below.
What this school's NCES data tells you
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter reports 54 enrolled students to the National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) alongside 3.0 full-time-equivalent teachers, producing a 18.7:1 student-teacher ratio. That figure sits 13% below the California state mean of 21.6:1, signalling more teacher attention per pupil than the state benchmark. Against the national 2024-25 average of 15.7:1, it is 19% higher, a useful calibration for families comparing districts across state lines.
Title I and federal lunch eligibility offer another window into the student body: 19.6% of pupils qualify for free meals, a proxy for household income that federal programs use to direct funding. The free-lunch share is 65% below the California average and 62% below the national baseline. Chronic absenteeism — missing 10% or more of school days — stands at 66.7% according to the 2021-22 Civil Rights Data Collection.
On the finance side, the surrounding Peak to Peak Mountain Charter District spends $11,492 per pupil district-wide, below the California average of $16,509 and below the national average of $16,593. Revenue comes 10.5% from local sources (property taxes), 84.4% from the state, and 5.2% from federal programs per the NCES F-33 finance survey. Taken together, these measurements produce a Resource Investment Index of 18/100 (F), calculated from 3 distinct NCES and CRDC indicators measuring resource allocation rather than academic outcomes.
Cross-validating school-level NCES values against California state and U.S. national means lets readers see whether this school is an outlier or in line with peers.
Metric
This school
vs California
California avg
U.S. avg
Students per teacher
18.7:1
▼ 13%
21.6:1
15.7:1
Free-lunch eligible
19.6%
▼ 65%
55.5%
51.8%
Enrollment
54
top 6%
—
—
Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25
Class size vs. every US school
Students per teacher (lower means more individual attention)
19smaller classes than 21% of 92,598 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
School size vs. every US school
Total enrollment — where this school sits by size (neither large nor small is 'better')
54larger than 6% of 95,891 US schools
Each bar is a band; taller bars hold more US schools. The dashed line + filled bar mark this entry. Hover or tap any bar for its full count, share, and where it sits relative to this entry.
Source U.S. Department of Education — NCES Common Core of Data · 2024-25
What the federal data reveals about equity at this school
Federal measurements — not ratings — surface the resource and opportunity picture. Below are the indicators that researchers, civil-rights monitors, and funding formulas use to assess equity.
Economic need
19.6%
free-lunch eligible
— 65% below the California average of 55.5%
Below the 40% Title I threshold — federal aid targets individual qualifying students rather than schoolwide programs.
Staffing depth
18.7:1
students per teacher
— 13% below state mean
Top 20% in California — lower ratio than 80% of state schools
Between 15:1 and 20:1 — in line with the typical U.S. public-school staffing range.
Engagement
66.7%
chronically absent (missed 10%+ of school days)
Chronic absenteeism at or above 20% — the CDC threshold for "high" — signals significant barriers to regular attendance.
Funding equity
$11,492
per pupil, district-wide
— below California avg of $16,509
Below the U.S. average per-pupil spend — funding constraints may affect programs, facilities, and staffing.
Support staff
Counselors0.0 FTE
Student-support staffing from the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Discipline context
0
in-school suspensions + 0 out-of-school
Suspension rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Combined in-school and out-of-school rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Reported via the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Overview
Enrollment54 Top 6% in California — larger than 94% of 10,006 state schools
Source: NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey District-level finance · FY 2021-22 Per-pupil expenditure reflects the district-wide average. Individual school budgets are not reported at the federal level.
Educator & family resources
In-depth guides on understanding NCES data, school choice, and education funding.
Treat this page as the federal baseline — then verify locally.
Compare Peak to Peak Mountain Charter side-by-side with another school you're considering on the same NCES measures. Compare schools →
Read the district context — spending per pupil, staffing, and equity ranking are district-level decisions that shape this school. District profile →
Confirm current enrollment windows, programs, and boundaries with the school directly — federal data lags the current school year. Choosing guide →
Figures are the school's reported federal record (CCD 2024-25, CRDC 2021-22) — coverage varies by entity type, and PlainSchools does not rate or rank schools.
Frequently asked questions about Peak to Peak Mountain Charter
How many students attend Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter has 54 students enrolled. It is a elementary school in Pine Mountain Club, CA.
What is the student-teacher ratio at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?
The student-teacher ratio at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter is 18.7:1, which is 13% lower than the California average of 21.6:1 and 19% higher than the national average of 15.7:1. Lower ratios generally mean more individual attention per student.
What percentage of students receive free lunch at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?
19.6% of students at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter are eligible for free lunch, compared to the California average of 55.5%.
What is the racial and ethnic makeup of Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?
The largest demographic group at Peak to Peak Mountain Charter is White at 53.7%. The school serves a diverse student body in Pine Mountain Club, CA.
What is the Resource Investment Index for Peak to Peak Mountain Charter?
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter has a Resource Investment Index of 18/100 (F) based on 3 factors: student-teacher ratio, attendance rates. This index measures federal resource allocation — staffing levels, program availability, and support services — not standardized test scores or academic outcomes.
Is Peak to Peak Mountain Charter a good school?
Peak to Peak Mountain Charter earns an F Resource Investment Index (18/100), even as it posts class sizes smaller than 80% of California schools. The Resource Investment Index reflects staffing, counselor access, gifted programs, and attendance reported to NCES, not test scores or academic outcomes, so treat it as a resource snapshot rather than an overall rating.