Elementary school (grades K-5) · Los Angeles, CA

Learning By Design Charter

Federal NCES profile for Learning By Design Charter, including enrollment, faculty, free-lunch eligibility, demographics, and resource indicators - Resource Investment Index 42/100.

2024-25 NCES dataElementary school (grades K-5)NCES 060209014271Charter school
0/100100/10042/100
👥 S:T ratio
0
🌟 Gifted program
30
📋 Attendance
96
Scored 0–100 from federal NCES and CRDC indicators, resource allocation, not test scores. Full methodology →

The verdict

Learning By Design Charter earns 42/100 on the Resource Investment Index, with class sizes larger than 94% of California schools.

#26 of 344
elementary schools in Los Angeles · Resource Index
42
Resource Index · Typical
28.5:1
large classes for California
67.0%
free-lunch eligible

Learning By Design Charter has class sizes larger than 94% of California schools. Computed live against every California school reporting to NCES.

By Resource Investment Index, Learning By Design Charter ranks #26 of 344 elementary schools in Los Angeles, CA.

Enrollment

114

California · 2024-25 NCES data

Teachers (FTE)

4.0

Federal CCD staff survey

Students per teacher

28.5:1

vs 21.5:1 California avg

+33% vs state

Free-lunch eligible

67.0%

vs 55.5% California avg

+21% vs state

Student-teacher ratio in context

How Learning By Design Charter compares with California and U.S. medians

Larger classes than state median
0:135:128.5:1

Source: NCES Common Core of Data As of 2024-25 federal staff survey Total enrollment ÷ full-time-equivalent classroom teachers

What stands out at Learning By Design Charter

Small campus without a staffing-size advantage

Learning By Design Charter enrolls fewer students than most California schools, yet its student-teacher ratio is still on the heavier side of the state distribution. Small enrollment therefore does not translate into more teacher capacity per student here. That makes staffing capacity, rather than campus scale alone, the useful interpretation. The counselor, attendance, and program indicators below help show whether the pressure is narrow or part of a broader resource constraint.

Resource indicators are the standout signal

Learning By Design Charter's economic-need measure is not at a state extreme, while its Resource Investment Index is. The campus outranks most California schools on the combined reported-resource measure, so the differentiator comes from staffing, counselor access, gifted programming, or attendance rather than from an unusually low-need population alone. The component breakdown identifies which inputs actually produce that placement.

Attendance is a relative strength

1.8% of Learning By Design Charter students were chronically absent in the 2021-22 civil-rights collection. On its face, that is a comparatively low historical rate, though this page does not treat it as a current national benchmark or guarantee current-year performance. Here, attendance is a more distinctive signal than the presence or absence of any single specialist role.

Learning By Design Charter is a higher-need, small charter elementary school in Los Angeles, California, enrolling 114 students.

Class loads run heavy: 28.5:1 is larger than about 94% of California schools and 33% above the 21.5:1 state mean, so each teacher carries more students than is typical.

Economic need runs somewhat above the state's typical profile, with 67.0% of students eligible for free meals.

Enrollment of 114 puts it in the smaller third of California schools by headcount.

Its Resource Investment Index lands in the upper third of 9,998 scored California schools.

Against 311 statewide peers matched on enrollment and economic need, it ranks in the upper tier at #122.

Its student body is led by African American (55%) and Hispanic or Latino (42%) (diversity index 52/100).

Attendance holds up well here: only 1.8% of students were chronically absent, below the typical post-pandemic national figure.

Its district draws 30.8% of revenue from federal sources, an above-typical federal share that tends to track a higher-need student population.

Among Los Angeles's elementary schools, it stands alongside Wish Community (860 students): Learning By Design Charter is smaller than that campus by headcount and runs heavier classes (28.5:1 vs 23.2:1).

Learning By Design Charter District is a single-school charter district, so Learning By Design Charter operates independently rather than alongside district-mates.

Sourced from NCES CCD, CRDC, and F-33 (federal records, not a quality verdict). How we source and compute this.

Source: National Center for Education Statistics Common Core of Data + CRDC + F-33 · 2024-25

How Learning By Design Charter compares

Learning By Design Charter on the metrics families compare, against California and U.S. means.

Metric This school vs California California avg U.S. avg
Students per teacher 28.5:1 ▲ 33% 21.5:1 15.7:1
Free-lunch eligible 67.0% ▲ 21% 55.5% 51.7%
Enrollment 114 top 89% - -

Source: NCES Common Core of Data School-level CCD + state/national means from Public School Universe · 2024-25

28.5:1
Leaner classes than 2% of US schools, heavier class loads than most.
114
Bigger than 11% of US schools by enrollment, a small campus.

Equity indicators (what these measure)

Economic need
67.0%
free-lunch eligible - 21% above the California average of 55.5%
Above the 40% Title I schoolwide threshold; federal funds support the whole school, not individual students.
Staffing depth
28.5:1
students per teacher - 33% above state mean
Top 94% in California - lower ratio than 6% of state schools
Well above 20:1, one of the more stretched staffing loads nationally relative to enrollment.
Engagement
1.8%
chronically absent (missed 10%+ of school days)
Below 5%, comfortably under the pre-pandemic national baseline for chronic absenteeism.
Funding equity
$18,402
per pupil, district-wide - above California avg of $16,509
Somewhat above the U.S. public-school average, reflecting higher local or state investment per enrolled student.
Support staff
Counselors0.0 FTE
Student-support staffing from the Civil Rights Data Collection.
Discipline context
0
in-school suspensions + 1 out-of-school
Suspension rate: 0.0 per 100 students. Combined in-school and out-of-school rate: 0.9 per 100 students. Reported via the Civil Rights Data Collection.

Student demographics

African American 55.3%
Hispanic or Latino 42.1%
Two or More 1.8%
Asian 0.9%

Largest group: African American at 55.3% of enrollment.

Student-body diversity index 51.7/100

Simpson diversity index - at 51.7, Learning By Design Charter is more mixed than the California school average of 46.0.

Programs

Funding & spending

District-wide per-pupil expenditure for Learning By Design Charter District, which includes Learning By Design Charter.

$18,402
Per student
+11%
vs California
Avg $16,509
+11%
vs U.S.
Avg $16,593
Revenue mix
Local 19.1%
State 50.1%
Federal 30.8%

Source: NCES F-33 School District Finance Survey District-level finance · FY 2021-22 Per-pupil expenditure reflects the district-wide average. Individual school budgets are not reported at the federal level.

Similar elementary schools in Los Angeles

6 comparable elementary schools (grades K-5) serving the same city.

Similar elementary schools statewide

Matched by enrollment size and by staffing ratio across all of California, not just this city - a different peer set than the local comparisons above.

Next steps

Verify locally before acting on Learning By Design Charter's federal record.

Federal record (CCD 2024-25, CRDC 2021-22) - PlainSchools assigns no subjective rating; the composite quality score is a transparent, reproducible index computed from this cited federal data.

Frequently asked questions about Learning By Design Charter

How many students attend Learning By Design Charter?

Learning By Design Charter has 114 students enrolled. It is an elementary school in Los Angeles, CA.

What is the student-teacher ratio at Learning By Design Charter?

The student-teacher ratio at Learning By Design Charter is 28.5:1, which is 33% higher than the California average of 21.5:1 and 82% higher than the national average of 15.7:1.

What percentage of students receive free lunch at Learning By Design Charter?

67.0% of students at Learning By Design Charter are eligible for free lunch, compared to the California average of 55.5%.

What is the racial and ethnic makeup of Learning By Design Charter?

The largest demographic group at Learning By Design Charter is African American at 55.3% of enrollment, in Los Angeles, CA. Its student body is more racially and ethnically mixed than most US schools, with a diversity index of 51.7/100.

What is the Resource Investment Index for Learning By Design Charter?

Learning By Design Charter has a Resource Investment Index of 42/100 (typical reported resources relative to schools nationally) based on 3 factors: student-teacher ratio, gifted-program reporting, chronic absenteeism. Not a test-score or academic measure (national median ~41/100, see methodology).

How does Learning By Design Charter rank among elementary schools in Los Angeles?

By Resource Investment Index, Learning By Design Charter ranks #26 of 344 elementary schools in Los Angeles, CA. This compares federal resource and staffing data among local peers; it is not a test-score or academic ranking. See all elementary schools in Los Angeles on the city page.

What other schools are in Learning By Design Charter District?

None; Learning By Design Charter District is a single-school charter district, and Learning By Design Charter is its only campus.

Source: National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) CCD + Public School Universe (2024-25), CRDC (2021-22), F-33 District Finance Survey (FY 2021-22) · 2024-25 Data as of the 2024-25 school year. Coverage from U.S. Department of Education NCES Common Core of Data. Varies by entity type; administrative districts and certain charter networks may report only a subset of fields.

All federal data sources used on this page

Full source list and how we compute each figure: methodology page.

View saved

Every figure on PlainSchools is rendered directly from the source NCES, CRDC and F-33 federal records, no number is typed in by an editor. Each school's figures reflect its most recent NCES/CRDC submission on file. See our editorial standards & corrections policy, the methodology behind these numbers, or report a data error. Data current as of July 2026.